Low Average IQ: 80 to 89
An IQ of 80 to 89 is classified as low average. About 16% of people score in this range, roughly 1 in 6. It is within the normal range, a little below the middle.
What's your IQ?
25 questions · about 12 minutes
What would you score? Try question 1.
Which option completes the grid? One tap, no sign-up.
- 9.1st to 25.2nd
- Percentile
- 1 in 6
- 16.1% of people
- Low average
- WAIS-IV label
What an IQ of 80 to 89 means
The range runs from about the 9th to the 25th percentile. The WAIS-IV, WISC-V and WAIS-5 all call it low average.
People in this range complete school, hold jobs across many fields and live fully independent lives. New, abstract material may take longer to learn, while familiar tasks are handled as well as anyone handles them.
Common characteristics
Concrete thinking style
Ideas land best when they are tied to real examples rather than theory.Prefers explicit instructions
Clear steps and expectations make new tasks quicker to master.Learns through repetition
New skills may need more practice at first, and then stick.Strong in familiar domains
Experience builds real expertise, and in a known field performance can match anyone's.
Work and everyday life
People with low average scores succeed in skilled trades, care work, retail, administration, transport and many other fields.
In these jobs experience, reliability and people skills often matter more than a few IQ points.
What the label does not tell you
This range overlaps heavily with average: 88 and 92 are within normal measurement error of each other. Tiredness, stress, language and unfamiliar test formats can each move a score by several points.
IQ classifications are statistical bands on a scale with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Individual abilities vary a lot within each band, and intelligence is one factor among many in how life turns out.
What the research says
Job performance research (Schmidt and Hunter, 1998) finds general ability predicts how quickly people learn a job, with the strongest effects in complex roles. In routine and practical work, experience narrows the gap over time.
Labels differ between tests. This range is called low average on the WAIS-IV, low average on the WISC-V and low average on the Stanford-Binet 5. The classifications overview compares the systems, and the IQ chart lists each score range with its percentile.
Low Average IQ: common questions
What does an IQ of 80 to 89 mean?
What jobs suit people with an IQ of 80 to 89?
How rare is an IQ of 80 to 89?
What are the characteristics of Low Average intelligence?
Can IQ in the 80 to 89 range be improved?
What are the limitations of an IQ of 80 to 89?
IQ score tools
- IQ chart: levels and score rangesEvery level from extremely low to very superior, with its score range and the share of people in it.
- IQ bell curve and standard deviationThe shape of the distribution, and how many people fall within each standard deviation.
- IQ percentile calculatorTurns an IQ score into an exact percentile and z-score.
- Percentile to IQ converterWorks backwards: the IQ score that sits at a given percentile, such as the 99th.
- How rare is my IQYour score as 1 in N, and how many people that is in a group of any size.
- Compare two IQ scoresThe gap between two scores in points, standard deviations and percentiles.
- IQ confidence interval calculatorThe range a score's true value probably falls in, given the test's reliability.
What's your IQ?
See which classification your own score falls in, from 25 visual reasoning questions.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Sources
- Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Pearson.
- American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR).
- Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79-132.
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(3-4), 447-472.
- Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
- Lubinski, D. (2009). Cognitive epidemiology: With emphasis on untangling cognitive ability and socioeconomic status. Intelligence, 37(6), 625-633.
- Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The Gifted Group at Mid-Life. Stanford University Press.
- Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-345.
- Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358-1369.
Percentages use a normal distribution with mean 100 and standard deviation 15. Methodology