IQ bell curve: distribution and standard deviation
The IQ bell curve has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. About 68% of people score 85 to 115, 95% score 70 to 130 and 99.7% score 55 to 145. Only 2.3% score over 130.
- 97.7%
- Higher than this share of people
- 1 in 44
- People who score this high or higher
- Gifted
- Classification, IQ 130 to 139
- +2.00 SD
- 30 points above the mean
Free to use with a link back to this page. The image is made in your browser, nothing is uploaded.
What does the IQ bell curve show?
The IQ bell curve shows how scores spread across a population when the average is set to 100. Most people cluster near the middle: about 68% score between 85 and 115 and about 95% between 70 and 130. The further a score sits from 100, the rarer it is.
Each band between two standard-deviation lines holds a fixed share of people. The chart labels them, and they add up the same way on every test that uses a standard deviation of 15.
| IQ range | Share of people |
|---|---|
| 55 to 70 | 2.1% |
| 70 to 85 | 13.6% |
| 85 to 100 | 34.1% |
| 100 to 115 | 34.1% |
| 115 to 130 | 13.6% |
| 130 to 145 | 2.1% |
So about 68% of people sit within one standard deviation of the mean (85 to 115) and about 95% within two (70 to 130). The shaded area on the interactive chart is everyone who scores below the marker.
Why is IQ a bell curve?
Mostly because it is built that way. Early tests divided mental age by real age. In 1939 David Wechsler replaced that with the deviation IQ: a person's raw score is compared with others of the same age, then converted so the norm group has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
That conversion makes the scores fit a normal curve. It is a choice of scale, not a law of nature. Many human traits, such as height, do cluster in a bell shape, and test scores come out close to it. The curve is a useful model, and the tails are where it is weakest.
How many people fall within 1, 2 and 3 standard deviations?
The same three numbers hold for any bell curve, which is why they are worth remembering: about 68%, 95% and 99.7%.
| Within | IQ range | Share inside | Share above the range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 SD | 85 to 115 | 68.3% | 15.9% |
| 2 SD | 70 to 130 | 95.4% | 2.3% |
| 3 SD | 55 to 145 | 99.7% | 0.13% |
Read the last column as the tail on one side. Two standard deviations up is IQ 130, and 2.3% of people score above it. Mensa-style societies admit the top 2% on an approved test, which is about 131. The Mensa eligibility checker converts that line for other scales.
From the curve to a number for your score
The curve gives shares of people. To turn a single score into a figure, use one of the tools built for it:
- The IQ chart lists the named levels, from average to very superior, and the score range of each.
- The IQ percentile calculator gives the exact percentile and z-score, and the percentile to IQ converter reverses it.
- How rare is my IQ turns the tail of the curve into "1 in N" and a head count.
What is the standard deviation of IQ?
The standard deviation of IQ is 15 points on almost all modern tests, including the Wechsler scales and the current Stanford-Binet. Older Stanford-Binet editions used 16 and the Cattell III B uses 24, so the same ability can produce different numbers. Always check which scale a score uses.
The same rarity on three scales
| Above average by | Top | SD 15 (Wechsler, SB5) | SD 16 (older Stanford-Binet) | SD 24 (Cattell III B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 SD | 15.9% | 115 | 116 | 124 |
| 2 SD | 2.3% | 130 | 132 | 148 |
| 3 SD | 0.13% | 145 | 148 | 172 |
A "148" on the Cattell III B scale and a "130" on a Wechsler test describe the same position on the curve. This chart uses a standard deviation of 15.
The Flynn effect and renorming
Raw scores rose through most of the 20th century. A meta-analysis of 271 samples by Pietschnig and Voracek (2015) found gains of roughly 2 to 3 IQ points per decade. In some countries the rise has since stalled or reversed.
This is why tests are renormed every 10 to 20 years. Each new norm sample resets the average to 100. An old test scored against old norms gives today's test takers a higher number than a freshly normed one would. The curve stays the same shape. The people on it change.
What the curve can and cannot tell you
It is a model
IQ looks like a bell curve partly by design: publishers convert raw scores so the norm group fits a normal distribution with a mean of 100. Real data has slightly more people at the very low end than the curve predicts, because of medical and developmental conditions.The tails are thin on evidence
A norm sample of a few thousand people contains only a handful above 145, so rarity figures out there are extrapolated. Most tests stop reporting at 160.Scales differ
Check whether a score uses a standard deviation of 15, 16 or 24 before comparing it with this chart.Every score has error
A single result is best read as a range of several points either side. The IQ confidence interval tool shows how wide.Norms age
Raw scores rose for decades in many countries (the Flynn effect), so a test normed long ago can flatter today's test takers.
Not the book
The Bell Curve (1994) is a book by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray. It is a separate and contested topic. This page covers only the statistical curve and what it says about how scores are spread.
Frequently asked questions
What is the IQ bell curve?
What is the average IQ?
What does a standard deviation of 15 mean?
What percentage of people have an IQ over 130?
Is IQ really normally distributed?
Who invented the IQ bell curve?
Why do some tests use a standard deviation of 16 or 24?
Is this about the book The Bell Curve?
Next in IQ calculators
More in IQ calculators
- Standard score to percentileScaled, T and z scores from a report
- Mensa eligibility checkerQualifying scores by test
- Are you smarter than AI?Your score against the models
Related tools
- IQ score percentilesEvery score from 70 to 200
- SAT, ACT and GRE to IQConvert a test score to IQ
You have seen the curve. Now find your place on it.
Take the 25-question visual reasoning test and see where your result lands.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Sources
- Wechsler, D. (1939). The Measurement of Adult Intelligence. Williams & Wilkins.
- Pietschnig, J., and Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: a formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909 to 2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3).
- Bratsberg, B., and Rogeberg, O. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. PNAS, 115(26).
- Wikipedia, IQ classification
- Wikipedia, Flynn effect
- Herrnstein, R., and Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve. Free Press.
- Percentiles and rarity on this page are computed from the normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.