Sunk Cost Fallacy
The phenomenon where a person is reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when it is clear that abandonment would be more beneficial.
What's your IQ?
25 questions · about 12 minutes
What would you score? Try question 1.
Which option completes the grid? One tap, no sign-up.
What is Sunk Cost Fallacy?
Sunk Cost Fallacy is a cognitive bias in which the phenomenon where a person is reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when it is clear that abandonment would be more beneficial. It occurs when loss aversion. We hate losing more than we like winning. For example, staying in a bad job, relationship, or investment because "I've already put so much into it."
Why it happens
This bias exists because human brains evolved for survival, not accuracy. Loss aversion. We hate losing more than we like winning. served our ancestors well. In modern contexts, it often misfires.
High-stakes domains (medicine, law, finance) have developed entire systems to counteract Sunk Cost Fallacy. If professionals need safeguards, so do you.
Sunk Cost Fallacy has been studied extensively since the cognitive revolution. Research consistently shows that even warned subjects fall for it: awareness alone doesn't provide immunity.
Real-world examples
- In investing: Sunk Cost Fallacy leads to holding losing positions too long or selling winners too early.
- In relationships: This bias causes people to interpret ambiguous signals in ways that confirm existing beliefs about partners.
- In work: Sunk Cost Fallacy makes it harder to update strategies when market conditions change.
- In health: People ignore symptoms that contradict their self-image as "healthy" or "young."
How to avoid it
Ignore the past cost. It is gone. Ask: "If I started today with what I have now, would I make this choice?"
- Seek disconfirming evidence: Actively look for data that challenges your current belief.
- Use decision journals: Write down predictions before outcomes are known, then review accuracy.
- Consult diverse perspectives: People with different backgrounds spot different biases.
- Implement decision rules: Pre-commit to criteria before emotionally charged situations arise.
- Time-box decisions: Revisit important conclusions after a cooling-off period.
Sunk Cost Fallacy: common questions
What is Sunk Cost Fallacy?
Why is Sunk Cost Fallacy also called "Throwing Good Money After Bad"?
How do I stop Sunk Cost Fallacy?
Why does Sunk Cost Fallacy happen?
Can smart people fall for Sunk Cost Fallacy?
What's an example of Sunk Cost Fallacy in real life?
What's your IQ?
The sunk cost fallacy keeps us on dead ends. Good puzzle solvers let a rule go the moment it stops fitting. See how quickly you do.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Sources
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
- Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational. HarperCollins.