John Locke IQ
John Locke's IQ is estimated at 145 to 165. Catharine Cox's 1926 study gave a corrected 165, from biographies rather than a test.
John Locke is estimated at 155+. Could you beat that?
Higher than 99.9% of people (1 in 8,137). Your score lands on the same scale.
Each row follows one rule. What fills the gap?Each row follows the same rule. What belongs in the empty cell?
Tap A to E. Your answer counts · 24 more after this · no sign-up
Locke's IQ is 155+. What's yours?
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Think you're smarter than John Locke? Try question 1.
Which option completes the grid? One tap, no sign-up.

Key facts
- Estimated IQ
- IQ 155+
- Known for
- Philosopher
- Lived
- Philosopher
- Basis
- Cox 1926 historiometric estimate
- Confidence
- Low. No IQ test was ever given. The figure below comes from a 1926 study that rated historical figures from biographies.
Cox's 1926 corrected estimate for John Locke was 165. LifeScore lists 155+, which is lower because Cox's old ratio-IQ scale runs higher than modern norms.
What was John Locke's IQ?
John Locke never took an IQ test. Catharine Cox's 1926 study of 301 eminent people gave a corrected estimate of 165. Adjusted by about 22 points for the Flynn effect that is roughly 145. LifeScore lists 155+, so the working range is 145 to 165.
Your turn
Locke's IQ is estimated at 155+. What's yours?
Locke's number is an estimate from the record. Yours can come from a real test: 25 visual reasoning puzzles, scored on the same scale, so you can see where you land next to Locke.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Where does the 165 figure come from?
The 165 is Catharine Cox's corrected estimate from her 1926 study of 301 eminent people born between 1450 and 1850. She rated each person from biographical records of what they could do as a child and young adult, then corrected for gaps in the record.
Cox's numbers sit on an old ratio-IQ scale. One secondary tabulation subtracts about 22 points for the Flynn effect, which puts John Locke near 145.
LifeScore lists 155+, and the working range of 145 to 165 spans both figures. None of them is a test result.
See how the other famous IQ numbers trace back in where famous IQ numbers come from.
The evidence behind the estimate
An estimate built from the historical record, not a recovered test score.
What supports it
- Catharine Cox's 1926 study of 301 eminent people gave John Locke a corrected estimate of 165, based on records of childhood and youth.
- Adjusted by about 22 points for the Flynn effect, that figure falls to roughly 145.
- Documented achievement as a philosopher is the other half of the evidence, and it is summarised in the profile below.
What it cannot prove
- Cox rated people from biographies, not tests, and her scale is not the modern deviation-IQ scale.
- Thin records pull estimates towards average, which is why Cox added a correction that itself adds uncertainty.
- Achievement reflects education, opportunity, persistence and collaboration as well as ability.
Estimates like Locke's come from the record, not a test sitting. The closest thing to a real, public score is the NFL: teams gave draft prospects the Wonderlic, and we collected 241 reported NFL Wonderlic scores with their sources. The same 12-minute, 50-question format is still used by employers, and you can sit a free Wonderlic-style practice test or the CCAT-style test tech employers use to see a real number of your own.
Locke compared with Spinoza, Smith, Erasmus
| Figure | Estimate | Range |
|---|---|---|
| John Locke | 155+ | 145–165 |
| Baruch Spinoza | 155+ | 155–175 |
| Adam Smith | 155+ | 150–170 |
| Desiderius Erasmus | 155 | 140–170 |
How would you score?
Where would you land next to John Locke?
John Locke's 155+ is an estimate from the historical record, with a working range of 145 to 165. On the standard IQ scale an IQ of 155 sits at the 99.99th percentile: about 1 in 8,137 people score that high. Nobody can test Locke now. You can find out where you sit on the same scale.
- 100Average adult50th percentile
- 130Gifted linetop 2%, about 1 in 44
- 155+Locke's99.99th percentile, about 1 in 8,137
- ?Youscored on the same scale
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Psychological profile
John Locke's IQ is represented here by a retrospective estimate of 155+, not a verified test result. John Locke is best known for exceptional empirical reasoning. The useful question is what the surviving evidence shows, not whether a precise modern score can be recovered.
Foundational empiricist who influenced liberal democracy. High openness with systematic approach to epistemology and political theory.
The dominant archetype here is The Sage. This archetype shapes decision patterns: what feels natural, what creates friction, and what blind spots tend to emerge.
Estimated IQ is 155+. This is a rough estimate based on documented accomplishments and contemporary accounts, not a literal measurement.
Key traits
Empirical reasoning
John displayed notable empirical reasoning, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.Political philosophy
John displayed notable political philosophy, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.Systematic thinking
John displayed notable systematic thinking, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.
Historical context
The 17th Century was an environment where The Sage-style minds could gain leverage quickly. The structural conditions matched John's strengths.
Lessons from Locke
- John's greatest strength (Empirical reasoning and Political philosophy) was also their greatest liability when taken to extremes.
- The The Sage archetype tends to succeed in environments that reward bold action and long-term vision, but struggles in environments that demand consensus-building.
- One pattern worth noting: John's output was most productive when external constraints forced focus. Without structure, the same traits that enabled greatness sometimes led to overreach.
A modern parallel
A modern figure with a similar operating style is Michael Sandel. Both fit the The Sage archetype. This is a comparison of style, not of IQ.
John Locke: common questions
Was John Locke a genius?
What personality type was John Locke?
Who is the modern equivalent of John Locke?
What can we learn from John Locke?
The IQ-style test the NFL used
John Locke's IQ is an estimate. Yours could be real.
Before the draft, NFL teams gave prospects the Wonderlic: 50 questions in 12 minutes, and almost nobody finishes. We collected 241 reported player scores, each with its source. The average working adult scores about 21.
Locke's IQ is 155+. What's yours?
Locke's estimate comes from the historical record. Yours can come from a real test: 25 visual reasoning questions.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Sources
- The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses (Cox, 1926), Stanford University Press, via Internet Archive. The original historiometric study. Cox rated 301 eminent people born 1450 to 1850 from biographical records of their childhood and youth.
- Cox's IQ estimates of 301 eminent geniuses, IQ Comparison Site. Secondary tabulation of Cox's corrected estimates, with a version adjusted by about 22 points for the Flynn effect.
- Genius 101, Springer Publishing Company. A modern overview of research on achievement, eminence and genius, including the limits of historiometric estimates.
- Cox, C. M. (1926). The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Stanford University Press.
- Simonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. Springer.
- Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Houghton Mifflin.
- Portrait: Godfrey Kneller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
Last reviewed September 2026. How we estimate historical IQ