The short answer
In the narrow sense, a genius has an IQ of about 140 or above, which is roughly 1 person in 261. That is the sense Lewis Terman used in 1916 when he labelled scores above 140 "near genius or genius". Only a supervised IQ test can tell you your number.
In the wider sense, genius means outstanding creative achievement, and IQ is only part of it. Researchers who study eminent people, such as Dean Keith Simonton, find that many acknowledged creators had IQs below 140, and that ability, sustained commitment and original ideas together do more to explain achievement than IQ alone.
Two meanings of genius
Genius as a very high IQ
When Lewis Terman revised the Stanford-Binet in 1916 he labelled scores above 140 “near genius or genius”. That label is historical, and it is the source of the popular idea that genius starts at an IQ of 140. There is no official line. Modern tests describe the top of the scale differently, and scores that high are hard to measure reliably.
Genius as achievement
Historians and psychologists who study genius mostly mean something else: a person whose work changes a field or a culture. Dean Keith Simonton, who has spent a career on the subject, defines genius either as superlative intelligence or as achieved eminence, and points out that the two do not line up neatly. Some acknowledged creative geniuses had IQs below 140.
By that second meaning, nobody can tell you that you are a genius today. It is a judgement about a body of work, made by others, often long after the work is done.
How rare each IQ is
Here is what share of people reach each IQ, on the standard scale with an average of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
| IQ | Share at or above | About 1 in | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 115 | 15.9% | 6 | One standard deviation above average |
| 120 | 9.1% | 11 | Superior |
| 130 | 2.3% | 44 | Common threshold for "gifted" (about the top 2%) |
| 135 | 0.98% | 102 | |
| 140 | 0.38% | 261 | Terman's 1916 "near genius or genius" line |
| 145 | 0.13% | 741 | Often used for "genius" in popular writing |
| 150 | 0.043% | 2,330 | |
| 160 | 0.0032% | 31,560 | Beyond what most tests can measure |
Above about 145 these are extrapolations from a bell curve. Tests have too few people in their norm groups at that level to measure it reliably, and different tests give different numbers for the same person.
The three-ring quiz
Joseph Renzulli argued that the giftedness that leads to achievement is where three things overlap: above-average ability, task commitment and creativity. This quiz asks five statements about each, so you can see which ring is strongest for you. A statement counts as a match when you choose “Mostly” or “Very me”.
15 statements left.
What research says about eminent people
Studies of eminent creators and scientists find a pattern. High intelligence helps, particularly for learning and abstract reasoning, but it does not separate the people who change a field from those who are simply very capable. What does is expertise built over years, persistent effort and original thinking.
Older estimates of the IQs of famous historical figures, such as the 1926 study by Catharine Cox, were made retrospectively from biographies and are weak evidence. Our own historical IQ profiles use the same caution: they are estimates with a stated range and level of confidence, not measurements.
How to test the IQ side
- Supervised test. The WAIS is the standard adult assessment. A score of 140 or more is rare, and a psychologist will explain the confidence interval around it.
- Mensa. Mensa's threshold is the top 2%, which is about 130 to 131. It is not a genius test, but it is a checkable milestone. See the Mensa practice test guide.
- Existing scores. The score converters estimate an IQ range from an SAT, ACT, GRE or similar score.
- Other people who have been called geniuses. Browse our historical IQ estimates and fictional characters.
Am I a genius? Common questions
What IQ is a genius?+
There is no official cut-off. Terman used above 140 in 1916, and popular usage often starts at 140 to 145. At 140, about 1 person in 261 scores higher, and at 145 about 1 in 741.
Can a quiz tell me if I am a genius?+
No. Genius is either a very high IQ, which needs a supervised test to measure, or outstanding achievement, which is a judgement made about a body of work. A quiz can only show which of the usual traits you recognise in yourself.
Are geniuses always high IQ?+
Not always. Studies of eminent creators find that many had IQs well above average, but not all cleared 140. Sustained effort, expertise and originality matter alongside intelligence.
How rare is an IQ of 160?+
About 1 person in 31,574 on a scale with a standard deviation of 15. Tests are unreliable at that level, so figures above about 145 are extrapolations rather than measurements.
Is a high IQ enough to be a genius?+
No. High IQ helps with learning and abstract reasoning, but eminent work also needs deep expertise, years of focused effort and original ideas. Many people with high IQs never make anything of historical note.
What is the three-ring model of giftedness?+
Joseph Renzulli's model says giftedness of the kind that leads to achievement sits where three things overlap: above-average ability, task commitment and creativity. The quiz on this page is built on it.
Keep exploring
- Am I gifted?A 20-question gifted-adult traits quiz.
- Am I smart?Five reasoning questions and an honest answer.
- IQ classification: geniusWhat genius-level scores mean on IQ scales.
- Historical figures' IQ estimatesHow researchers estimate the IQs of people from history.
- Highest-IQ historical figuresA ranking with evidence and confidence for each.
- IQ tests explainedRaven's, WAIS, Stanford-Binet, Cattell and Mensa.
References & Sources
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative genius as a personality phenomenon: Definitions, methods, findings, and issues. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00455.x
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Freund, P. A., & Kasten, N. (2012). How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 296-321. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ977509
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13-23.