Social skills reflection
Social intelligence test
A social intelligence test checks how well you read people, understand social settings and handle tricky moments. This one mixes 9 everyday scenarios with 9 statements to rate, and takes about 5 minutes. You get a score out of 100, three facet scores and a review explaining the strongest response to each scenario. No sign-up.
Question 1 of 18
About 5 minutes · No sign-up
Some questions are everyday scenarios: pick what you would most likely do. Others are statements to rate.
After a meeting, a colleague says "I'm fine", but they are unusually quiet and avoiding eye contact.
What do you most likely do?
Tip: press 1 to 3 to answer
How the social intelligence test works
There are two kinds of question. Nine are short scenarios, such as a colleague taking credit for your idea, where you choose what you would most likely do. Each option is rated as the strongest, an acceptable or a weak response, worth 4, 2 or 0 points.
The other nine are statements about yourself, rated from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree" for 0 to 4 points. Three are worded in reverse, so agreeing with them lowers your score. Each facet has three scenarios and three statements, so your facet scores are half judgement and half self-view.
Scenario tests like this are called situational judgement tests. Employers use them because judgement about realistic situations tends to say more than a list of self-descriptions. The scenarios and ratings here were written by the LifeScore Editorial Team; they are not a published test and have no norms behind them.
What your social intelligence score means
Your score is your total points as a share of the 72 available. After the bands, read the scenario review: it is the most practical part of the result.
| Score | Band | What it tends to describe |
|---|---|---|
| 0 to 44 | Developing | Signals and unwritten rules often take effort to read |
| 45 to 64 | Solid | Handles most situations well, with a few blind spots |
| 65 to 84 | Strong | Reads rooms well and handles friction calmly |
| 85 to 100 | Very strong | Chose the strongest response almost every time |
The three facets
Researchers have split social intelligence in several ways. The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, for example, separates social information processing, social skills and social awareness. This test uses three similar, practical facets, with original items.
- Reading others
- Picking up what people feel and mean from tone, face and timing, not just their words.
- Social awareness
- Understanding the unwritten rules, timing and dynamics of a group or setting.
- Handling situations
- Acting well in tricky moments: tension, conflict, credit, criticism and new groups.
Social intelligence versus emotional intelligence
The idea is more than a century old. In 1920, the psychologist Edward Thorndike described social intelligence as the ability to understand people and to act wisely in human relations, and set it beside abstract and practical intelligence.
Emotional intelligence came later and focuses on emotions: noticing, understanding and managing them in yourself and others. Social intelligence is broader in one way and narrower in another. It covers group dynamics, timing, norms and influence, but it is less concerned with your inner emotional life.
Social intelligence is also different from extraversion. A quiet person can be excellent at reading a room, and a talkative person can miss every cue. If you want to see where you sit on that separate trait, try the ambivert test.
Questions people ask
What is social intelligence?
Why mix scenarios and self-rating?
Are the "best" answers always right?
Can social intelligence be improved?
Is social intelligence linked to IQ?
Is this the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale?
Sources
- Silvera, D. H., Martinussen, M., and Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313 to 319.
- Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper's Magazine, 140, 227 to 235.
- McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., and Braverman, E. P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 730 to 740.
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I. (2001). The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241 to 251. · an example of a performance-based measure of reading others
This is a self-reflection tool, not a diagnosis or a psychological assessment. Written and reviewed by the LifeScore Editorial Team. Last updated 2 October 2026.
Related tests
- Ambivert testWhere you sit between introvert and extravert.
- Emotional intelligence testHow you perceive and understand emotions.
- Emotional maturity testHow you handle feelings, blame and feedback.
- Communication style quizHow you tend to talk, listen and handle conflict.
- 12 archetypes testYour primary and shadow archetype.
- All tools and testsEvery LifeScore quiz, calculator and practice test.