US test

LSAT to IQ converter

Enter an LSAT score (120 to 180) for an estimated IQ, a likely range and a percentile among test-takers. The percentiles come from LSAC's own table; the IQ link is a labelled assumption.

Reviewed September 2026By the LifeScore Editorial TeamEditorial policy

Score from 120 to 180.

Estimated IQ for a LSAT score of 160

115likely range 103–127

Likely rangeEstimateIf LSAT measured IQ perfectly: 118
Among LSAT test-takers
71st percentile (the top 29%)
Among everyone, at that IQ
84th percentile (1 in 6 at or above)

Your LSAT of 160 points to about IQ 115 (103–127). That is a guess made from a reasoning-and-reading stand-in. Your own reasoning score could land above or below it. The 25-question LifeScore test looks at reasoning directly.

Find your own score

25 questions, 12 minutes. Free to take. Your score and full report are a paid unlock once you finish.

LSAT to IQ at a glance

An LSAT of 165 points to an IQ of about 119, with a likely range of 106–131. A 170 points to about 122 (110–135), and a 175 to about 127 (115–139).

The LSAT is built to test the reasoning skills law students need, so it is probably one of the cleaner reasoning-based tests here. But no study has published how closely it tracks IQ, so the link used here is an assumption. Expect the true value for any one person to sit anywhere in the range shown.

Notable LSAT scores and the IQ they point to
LSAT scorePercentile among test-takersEstimated IQLikely range
14011th10290 to 114
14521th10593 to 118
15037th10996 to 121
15554th11299 to 124
16071th115103 to 127
16585th119106 to 131
17094th122110 to 135
17297th124112 to 137
17599th127115 to 139
17899th129117 to 141
180100th132120 to 145

LSAT to IQ conversion chart

Every row below comes from the same model as the calculator. The likely range covers about four in five people at that score. The last column shows what the IQ would be if the LSAT were a perfect measure of IQ, which is the number many other converters publish.

LSAT to IQ chart (120 to 180)
LSAT scoreTest-taker percentileEstimated IQLikely rangeIf a perfect measure
1401110290 to 11496
14215.210491 to 11699
14419.410592 to 117101
14624.310694 to 118103
14830.110795 to 120105
15036.610996 to 121107
15243.511098 to 122109
15450.411199 to 123111
15657.6112100 to 125113
15864.5114101 to 126115
16071.1115103 to 127118
16277.2116104 to 129120
16482.5118105 to 130122
16687.2119107 to 131125
16891.4121109 to 133127
17094.5122110 to 135130
17296.7124112 to 137133
17498.1126114 to 138136
17698.9128115 to 140139
17899.4129117 to 141141
18099.9132120 to 145147

IQ to LSAT: what score to expect

Going the other way, this table shows the LSAT score people at each IQ typically get. Scores at the same IQ vary widely, so the range matters more than the middle figure.

Typical LSAT score by IQ
IQTypical LSAT scoreLikely rangeHow rare is this IQ
90142129 to 1541 in 4 at or below
100148136 to 1591 in 2 at or above
110153141 to 1641 in 4 at or above
115156145 to 1671 in 6 at or above
120159147 to 1691 in 11 at or above
125162150 to 1711 in 21 at or above
130164153 to 1731 in 44 at or above
135167156 to 1751 in 102 at or above
140169159 to 1781 in 261 at or above
145171161 to 1791 in 741 at or above

One IQ, several tests: LSAT next to other scores

The same IQ shows up as very different numbers on different tests. This table shows the typical score at each IQ on LSAT and on the tests closest to it. Read across a row to compare, for example, what an SAT and an ACT would each be for the same person.

Typical score by IQ across LSAT, GRE, GMAT, MCAT, SAT
IQLSATGREGMATMCATSAT
100148298525492990
1101533065654981140
1201593156055041280
1301643236455101410
1401693326755151530

These are typical scores, not guarantees. Every test has its own likely range, shown on its page.

What the LSAT measures

The LSAT tests reading and reasoning with almost no subject knowledge required. Logical Reasoning asks you to find flaws in short arguments and to work out what follows from a set of premises. Reading Comprehension asks for close reading of dense passages.

That design makes it a reasonable stand-in for verbal and analytical reasoning. It is also unusually trainable. The old Logic Games section, which was dropped in August 2024, was the clearest example: people improved by learning the technique, which is why prep courses moved scores by many points there. Removing it removed the most trainable section, though scores on the remaining sections still respond to practice.

We could not find any published study correlating the LSAT with an IQ battery. A figure of .36 circulates online, but it traces to an unsourced student post and looks like a validity figure for law school grades, not for IQ. The correlation used here is an assumption of .60.

Why an LSAT of 160 is not "average"

LSAT test-takers are college graduates who have chosen to apply to law school. They are, on average, above the general population in ability, so a mid-range LSAT score means something different from a mid-range score on a test everyone takes. This converter assumes law applicants average about 111 in IQ, with a narrower spread than the general population.

That assumption raises every estimate by roughly ten points compared with treating the LSAT percentile as a general-population percentile. It is also the assumption you should question if you disagree with the number you see: change it and the whole table shifts.

Mensa treats the LSAT as an acceptable qualifying test for admission, based on the 95th percentile for tests taken after 1982. The percentile is what matters, and the exact score that corresponds to it changes as LSAC updates its tables, at about 170 or 171 in current data.

The 2024 changes and comparing across years

The scale is still 120 to 180. LSAC has said scores from before and after the removal of Logic Games remain comparable, and the percentile table here pools the 2023-24, 2024-25 and 2025-26 testing years so it covers the transition.

If your score is from before 2024 it is still a valid score. But the mix of people who take the LSAT has also changed, with volumes up sharply in recent years, so treat older percentile tables in books and guides as approximate.

What your LSAT score means

Percentiles compare you with other recent test-takers. The estimated IQ column shows the most likely value, with the likely range in brackets.

What LSAT score bands mean
ScoreEstimated IQWhat it means
120 to 13987 to 102Bottom tenth of test-takers or so. The estimated IQ is around 100, close to the general average because test-takers are a selected group.
140 to 149102 to 108Below the median. Strong reasoning is still common here, since the exam rewards technique that not everyone has practised.
150 to 159109 to 114Around the middle, with the median at about 154. The estimated IQ is in the low 110s.
160 to 169115 to 122Above average, roughly the top third to the top 9% of test-takers. The estimate is in the mid to high 110s.
170 to 174122 to 126Top 5% down to the top 2%. Competitive for the most selective law schools.
175 to 180127 to 132The top 1.5%. Very rare, and where technique, timing and a good day count for as much as ability.

Why a LSAT score is not an IQ

  • No published IQ correlationThe link between LSAT and IQ used here is an assumption, so treat the point estimate loosely and the range seriously.
  • It rewards practiceReasoning skills of the kind the LSAT tests improve with study. A high score can reflect months of preparation more than raw ability.
  • The pool is selectedOnly people who plan to apply to law school take it. The estimate depends on our assumption of how able that group is on average.
  • Small differences at the top are noiseBetween 172 and 178 the score changes by a handful of questions. That is well inside the estimate's range of error.

The evidence behind these numbers

Evidence grade: Weak

LSAC's percentile table is official and current. Whether the LSAT tracks IQ closely has not been published, so the IQ link is an assumption.

Published facts we used

  • Percent of test-takers below each score from 125 to 180 (LSAC LSAT percentiles, pooled 2023-24 to 2025-26).
  • The mean of about 153 and SD of about 11 are our calculations from that table, not LSAC figures.

Assumptions we made

  • Mean IQ of LSAT test-takers: 111. College graduates applying to law school.
  • IQ spread among test-takers: SD 12.
  • Correlation between LSAT and IQ among test-takers: .60. No published value exists.
Assumed test-taker IQ
mean 111, SD 12
Assumed correlation (r)
0.6
Likely range
The score at which about 80% of people with that estimate fall, from the residual spread after regression
Norms
LSAC percentile table, pooled testing years 2023-24 to 2025-26.

LSAT to IQ: frequently asked questions

What LSAT score equals an IQ of 130?+

People with an IQ of 130 typically score around 164 on the LSAT, with about four in five between 153–173. There is no published correlation, so treat this as a rough guide.

Is a 170 LSAT a high IQ?+

A 170 is in the top the top 6% of test-takers. It points to an IQ of about 122, most likely within 110–135. That is well above average, and the exact number is uncertain.

Is the LSAT an IQ test?+

No. It tests reasoning and reading skills relevant to law school and is used to predict first-year grades. It correlates with intelligence but does not measure it directly.

What LSAT score does Mensa accept?+

US Mensa accepts an LSAT score at the 95th percentile for tests taken after 1982. In current LSAC data that is about 170 or 171, and the exact figure moves a little each year.

Did removing Logic Games change how LSAT scores relate to IQ?+

It probably made the test slightly less trainable, but no research has measured its effect on IQ correlations. The scale and percentiles carry on unchanged, so this converter applies to scores from before and after.

How many LSAT points is one IQ point?+

Around the middle of the scale, roughly half an LSAT point per IQ point: people at IQ 100 typically score about 148, and people at IQ 130 about 164.

References & Sources

  1. Law School Admission Council (2026). LSAT percentiles. LSAC. https://www.lsac.org/data-research/data/lsat-percentiles

  2. American Mensa (2026). Qualifying test scores. us.mensa.org. https://www.us.mensa.org/join/testscores/qualifying-test-scores/

  3. Wainer, H. (2000). Kelley's paradox. Chance, 13(1), 47-48. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09332480.2000.10542192