Fluid versus crystallised intelligence
In the 1940s the psychologist Raymond Cattell split general intelligence into two broad parts, and his student John Horn developed the idea. Fluid intelligence, often written Gf, is reasoning with new material: spotting patterns, forming rules and solving problems you have no recipe for. Crystallised intelligence, Gc, is what that reasoning leaves behind: vocabulary, facts and learned methods.
| Fluid intelligence (Gf) | Crystallised intelligence (Gc) | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Reasoning with problems that are new to you | Knowledge and skills you have built up |
| Typical test items | Matrices, series, classification, analogies with shapes | Vocabulary, general knowledge, comprehension |
| How schooling affects it | Less directly, though not zero | Strongly |
| Across adult life | Peaks in early adulthood, then declines slowly | Grows into middle age and holds up well |
| Example from daily life | Working out an unfamiliar app or game | Explaining a word or a historical event |
The two are related. People high on one tend to be above average on the other, because fluid reasoning is how knowledge gets built. Modern models of intelligence, such as the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model, keep both as broad abilities under a general factor.
This test is deliberately one-sided. Every item is a picture puzzle with a rule to discover, so it leans almost entirely on Gf. That is what makes it a fluid intelligence test rather than a general knowledge quiz.
Three fluid reasoning practice items
Each item has a rule you probably have not met in exactly this form. That is the point: fluid reasoning is what you use when there is no method to remember. These are practice items for this page, not test questions.
Count goes down the rows and size goes across the columns. What is missing?
Tap an option to check your answer. This is a practice item, not part of the scored test.
The third cell in each row is built from the first two. Which cell completes the last row?
Tap an option to check your answer. This is a practice item, not part of the scored test.
Count and colour both follow a rule that links the three cells in a row. What completes the last row?
Tap an option to check your answer. This is a practice item, not part of the scored test.
How fluid intelligence changes with age
Fluid reasoning develops fast through childhood and the teens, peaks in early adulthood and then declines slowly. Timothy Salthouse, who has studied this for decades, found that some measures of reasoning and speed begin to fall in healthy, educated adults in their twenties and thirties, long before anyone would notice in daily life.
Crystallised knowledge tells a different story. Vocabulary and general knowledge usually keep rising into middle age and hold up well into later life. That is why older adults often do better than younger ones on a knowledge test and worse on a timed puzzle test, even when they are equally sharp.
| Age | Fluid reasoning | Crystallised knowledge |
|---|---|---|
| 18 to 30 | At or near its peak | Still growing |
| 30 to 50 | Slow decline begins | Growing or stable |
| 50 to 70 | Decline more noticeable on timed tasks | Usually stable |
| 70 and over | Wider differences between people | Stable for many, declining for some |
One honest note: this test scores everyone on the same scale and is not adjusted for age. If you are over 50, a professionally normed test would compare you with people your own age, and your standing there would usually be higher than a raw comparison suggests. The IQ test for seniors page explains this in detail.
Where fluid intelligence shows up in daily life
Fluid reasoning is what you lean on when experience runs out. A few everyday examples:
- Learning a new system. A new job, a new app, the rules of an unfamiliar game. The first week leans on fluid reasoning; after that, experience takes over.
- Spotting what is odd. Noticing that a set of figures does not add up, or that a plan has a hidden flaw.
- Solving a problem with no manual. Fixing something you have never fixed, or planning a route with a new constraint.
- Transferring an idea. Seeing that a trick from one area solves a problem in another.
This is also why fluid reasoning relates to how quickly people learn on the job, especially early on. Over time, knowledge and practice carry more of the load, which is one reason experience can make up for a dip in puzzle speed at work.
Can you improve fluid intelligence?
In 2008 a study by Susanne Jaeggi and colleagues reported that training on a working memory game, the n-back task, raised scores on a fluid reasoning test. It made headlines and helped launch the brain-training industry.
Later research was less encouraging. Meta-analyses, including one by Monica Melby-Lervåg and Charles Hulme in 2013, found that working memory training improves the trained task and similar tasks, but shows no convincing lasting gain on fluid reasoning itself. The current consensus is that you get better at the game, not at reasoning in general.
- What does help a test score: sleep, a quiet room and familiarity with the item types. Practice items like the ones above can add a little on a first retest.
- What helps reasoning over a lifetime: education. A large 2018 meta-analysis by Stuart Ritchie and Elliot Tucker-Drob estimated that each extra year of schooling adds roughly one to five IQ points.
- What protects it with age: the same things that protect the rest of the body and brain, such as physical activity and good health. The evidence here is mostly about slowing decline, not boosting a score.
How this fluid intelligence test works, and what it costs
All 25 items in the test above are fluid reasoning items: picture puzzles where the rule is new. None of them asks what a word means or tests a fact.
- 25
- Visual questions
- 12 min
- Time limit
- 0
- Sign-ups to start
- £3.99
- Full report, one-time
Five sets of five, each easy to hard
One timer for the whole test
No account, no email to begin
US$4.99. No subscription
- What you answer. 25 picture puzzles in five sets: patterns, spatial reasoning, sequences, analogies, rules. There is no vocabulary, trivia or school maths.
- How long. One 12-minute timer. You can go back and change an answer until it runs out. When it does, the test ends with the answers you have given.
- What it costs. Starting and finishing the test costs nothing and needs no account. When you finish, you choose a report to see your result. Full report from £3.99 ($4.99), one-time. No subscription.
- What it is not. LifeScore is a 25-question online visual reasoning test. It is not a clinical assessment and is not administered by a psychologist. It is not age-normed, and the result is an estimate, not a diagnosis.
- The report breaks your result into the five question sets, so you can see whether patterns, spatial items or rules came most easily.
Questions people ask
What is a fluid intelligence test?
What is the difference between fluid and crystallised intelligence?
At what age does fluid intelligence peak?
Can you increase fluid intelligence?
Is Raven's a fluid intelligence test?
Is fluid intelligence the same as IQ?
Related pages
- Culture fair IQ testFluid tests and the hunt for a fair test.
- Visual IQ testEvery question is a picture.
- Raven's Progressive MatricesThe classic fluid reasoning test.
- Pattern recognition testSix matrix puzzles with a score.
- Digit span testWorking memory, a close cousin of Gf.
- IQ test for seniorsWhy age matters for timed reasoning.
Sources
- Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1-22.
- Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107-129.
- Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507-514.
- Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. PNAS, 105(19), 6829-6833.
- Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270-291.
- Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358-1369.