Fyodor Dostoevsky IQ
Fyodor Dostoevsky's IQ is estimated at 140 to 160. No verified test score exists; LifeScore's 150+ is an estimate from the documented record.
Fyodor Dostoevsky is estimated at 150+. Could you beat that?
Higher than 99.9% of people (1 in 2,330). Your score lands on the same scale.
Each row follows one rule. What fills the gap?Each row follows the same rule. What belongs in the empty cell?
Tap A to E. Your answer counts · 24 more after this · no sign-up
Dostoevsky's IQ is 150+. What's yours?
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Think you're smarter than Fyodor Dostoevsky? Try question 1.
Which option completes the grid? One tap, no sign-up.

Key facts
What was Fyodor Dostoevsky's IQ?
No IQ test result for Fyodor Dostoevsky is known. LifeScore lists 150+ as an editorial estimate, with a working range of 140 to 160. It is a comparison marker based on documented achievement as a novelist, not a measured score, and it carries very low confidence.
Your turn
Dostoevsky's IQ is estimated at 150+. What's yours?
Dostoevsky's number is an estimate from the record. Yours can come from a real test: 25 visual reasoning puzzles, scored on the same scale, so you can see where you land next to Dostoevsky.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
The evidence behind the estimate
An estimate built from the historical record, not a recovered test score.
What supports it
- His major novels sustain complex moral, philosophical and psychological perspectives.
- His engineering education provides some evidence beyond literary achievement.
- His influence across literature, philosophy and psychology is extensively documented.
What it cannot prove
- Literary genius is not equivalent to general intelligence.
- Translation and cultural distance complicate evaluation.
- No psychometric measurement exists.
Estimates like Dostoevsky's come from the record, not a test sitting. The closest thing to a real, public score is the NFL: teams gave draft prospects the Wonderlic, and we collected 241 reported NFL Wonderlic scores with their sources. The same 12-minute, 50-question format is still used by employers, and you can sit a free Wonderlic-style practice test or the CCAT-style test tech employers use to see a real number of your own.
Dostoevsky compared with Edgar Allan Poe, Dickens, Austen
| Figure | Estimate | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Fyodor Dostoevsky | 150+ | 140–160 |
| Edgar Allan Poe | 150 | 135–165 |
| Charles Dickens | 145+ | 145–180 |
| Jane Austen | 145+ | 130–155 |
How would you score?
Where would you land next to Fyodor Dostoevsky?
Fyodor Dostoevsky's 150+ is an estimate from the historical record, with a working range of 140 to 160. On the standard IQ scale an IQ of 150 sits at the 99.96th percentile: about 1 in 2,330 people score that high. Nobody can test Dostoevsky now. You can find out where you sit on the same scale.
- 100Average adult50th percentile
- 130Gifted linetop 2%, about 1 in 44
- 150+Dostoevsky's99.96th percentile, about 1 in 2,330
- ?Youscored on the same scale
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Psychological profile
Fyodor Dostoevsky's IQ is represented here by a retrospective estimate of 150+, not a verified test result. Fyodor Dostoevsky is best known for exceptional psychological depth. The useful question is what the surviving evidence shows, not whether a precise modern score can be recovered.
Explored darkest depths of human psychology. High neuroticism channeled into understanding of guilt, suffering, and redemption. Near-execution transformed worldview.
The dominant archetype here is The Magician. This archetype shapes decision patterns: what feels natural, what creates friction, and what blind spots tend to emerge.
Estimated IQ is 150+. This is a rough estimate based on documented accomplishments and contemporary accounts, not a literal measurement.
Key traits
Psychological depth
Fyodor displayed notable psychological depth, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.Moral complexity
Fyodor displayed notable moral complexity, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.Spiritual seeking
Fyodor displayed notable spiritual seeking, a trait that shaped their approach to challenges and opportunities.
Historical context
The 19th Century was an environment where The Magician-style minds could gain leverage quickly. The structural conditions matched Fyodor's strengths.
Lessons from Dostoevsky
- Fyodor's greatest strength (Psychological depth and Moral complexity) was also their greatest liability when taken to extremes.
- The The Magician archetype tends to succeed in environments that reward bold action and long-term vision, but struggles in environments that demand consensus-building.
- One pattern worth noting: Fyodor's output was most productive when external constraints forced focus. Without structure, the same traits that enabled greatness sometimes led to overreach.
A modern parallel
A modern figure with a similar operating style is David Foster Wallace. Both fit the The Magician archetype. This is a comparison of style, not of IQ.
Fyodor Dostoevsky: common questions
Was Fyodor Dostoevsky a genius?
What personality type was Fyodor Dostoevsky?
Who is the modern equivalent of Fyodor Dostoevsky?
What can we learn from Fyodor Dostoevsky?
The IQ-style test the NFL used
Fyodor Dostoevsky's IQ is an estimate. Yours could be real.
Before the draft, NFL teams gave prospects the Wonderlic: 50 questions in 12 minutes, and almost nobody finishes. We collected 241 reported player scores, each with its source. The average working adult scores about 21.
Dostoevsky's IQ is 150+. What's yours?
Dostoevsky's estimate comes from the historical record. Yours can come from a real test: 25 visual reasoning questions.
25 questions · about 12 minutes
Sources
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Encyclopaedia Britannica. Documents his education, major works and intellectual influence.
- Fyodor Dostoevsky, Poetry Foundation. Provides additional biographical and literary context.
- Cox, C. M. (1926). The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Stanford University Press.
- Simonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. Springer.
- Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Houghton Mifflin.
- Portrait: Vasily Perov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
Last reviewed September 2026. How we estimate historical IQ